|
|
|
1.
|
? PUBLICATION ETHICS
1. ARTICLE AUTONOMY
1.1. Editors assess the scholastic legitimacy of the submitted research papers on the basis of significance.
1.2. Irrespective of race, ethnicity, gender and any other institutional pressurization, the editors has the full liberty to plan to the substantive planning of issue.
2. SECRECY
2.1. The utmost Secrecy is maintained during reviewing process of the submitted paper except the editorial board of the journal.
3. DIVULGENCE
3.1. The unpublished research paper will not be utilized by editor or any of such people on the board and/or in position of advisory and reviewer.
4. PRODUCTION CHOICES
4.1. It is guaranteed that two subject experts will analyze the submitted research papers. The approval of selecting and modifying the expected correction including the remarks and comments towards defamation and/or any lawful condition and intellectual property and/or plagiarized content, the editor can have the general power of setting aside such data or the whole paper.
5. THE CORRECTIVE AND RESPONSIVE MEASURE
5.1. The utmost preference is imparted on the original work. The withdrawal of any research paper stands in the event of instances of the remarks and comments towards defamation and/or any lawful condition and intellectual property and/or plagiarized content, even after post publication and such declaration is published in its consequent issue.
5.2. The corrective and responsive measure will be taken against the distributed paper by announcing it in the next issue.
6. RETRACTION AND CORRECTION
6.1. Retraction and correction are performed after being noticed by editor and/or any other person; it will be published with retraction and correction. It stands obligatory for the author to inform such retraction and correction
|
|
|
2.
|
? OBLIGATIONS OF REVIEWERS
1. COMMITMENT
1.1. The submitted research paper is settled for publication after two Peer Reviewers positive consent as a fundamental segment. The decency, logical procedure, academic quality and significance are the parameters for the Reviewers to review the papers.
2. INSTANTANEOUSNESS
2.1. Any unethical procedure of reviewer, like the author’s revelation and/or any unsuitable act, is always unwelcomed in the procedure of publication.
3. SECRECY
3.1. The utmost Secrecy is maintained during reviewing process of the submitted paper except the editorial board of the journal.
4. OBJECTIVITY
4.1. It is ethically responsibility of the reviewer to write the comments and/or other academic suggestive measure for the enhancement original submitted data, if any.
4.2. The utmost objectivity is followed in the academic and scholastic suggestion in the submitted research paper.
5. THE CORRECTIVE AND RESPONSIVE MEASURE
5.1. The utmost preference is imparted on the original work. The withdrawal of any research paper stands in the event of instances of the remarks and comments towards defamation and/or any lawful condition and intellectual property and/or plagiarized content, even after post publication and such declaration is published in its consequent issue.
6. CONFLICT OF INTEREST
6.1. Reviewers ought not to consider the submitted research work in which they have irreconcilable situations coming about because of aggressive, synergistic, or different connections or associations with any of the creators, organizations, or establishments associated with the papers.
7. REVIEWERSHIP (Elsevier Publishing Campus)
• Provides a thorough and comprehensive report
• Submits the report on time
• Provides well-founded comments for authors
• Gives constructive criticism
• Demonstrates objectivity
• Provides a clear recommendation to the editor
|
|
|
3.
|
? DUTIES OF AUTHORS
1. STANDARDS OF THE SUBMITTED DATA
1.1. Original research paper, including all scientific and ethical research procedure, is permitted to be submitted for the publication in the Journal and it stands on the part of the concerned author/researcher.
1.2. The submitted original work ought to have the traits of qualitative references.
1.3. Any unethical remarks and comments towards defamation and/or any lawful condition and intellectual property and/or plagiarized content,
2. UNORIGINALITY AND/OR PLAGIARISM
2.1. It is on the part of author/research to guarantee the unique and original work.
2.2. The proper and authentic references must be mentioned in the submitted original research paper.
2.3. The rewording, spinning and other unethical structures are rejected.
3. SUBMISSION
3.1. Authors are not allowed to submit their research paper s to other journals during the review process of this journal. No distribution of the submitted research work is permitted until the publication.
3.2. Submitting to more than journal is unethical and unwelcomed
4. DIVULGENCE
4.1. The unpublished research paper will not be utilized by editor or any of such people on the board and/or in position of advisory and reviewer.
5. PUBLICATION ADHERENCE
5.1. It is the responsibility of the author to have solicitations for press bans and ought to not by and large permit their research work to be accounted for in the press on the off chance that they have been acknowledged for publication.
6. RETRACTION AND CORRECTION
6.1. Retraction and correction are performed after being noticed by editor and/or any other person; Infringements of professional ethical codes, such as multiple submission, bogus claims of authorship, plagiarism, and fraudulent use of data will be retracted and corrected by the author within the stipulated time. It stands obligatory for the author to inform such retraction and correction.
7. AUTHORSHIP:
• Report only real, unfabricated data
• Originality
• Declare any conflicts of interest
• Submit to one journal at a time
8. AVOID:
• Fabrication: making up research data
• Falsification: manipulation of existing research data
• Plagiarism: previous work taken and passed off as one’s own
• Ghost Authorship: excluding authors who participated in the work
• Gift Authors: including authors who did not contribute to the work
(For more information visit publishingcampus.com)
|
|
|
|
4.
|
? JOURNAL ACCESS
1. Research Demagogue is an Open Access Journal.
2. Research Demagogue commits to be available permanently on the website.
3. The preservation of published works in the journal will be ensured Digital Object Identifier.
4. Research Demagogue is committed to be faithful to open access for scholarly work.
5. All the published papers are allowed to get from the date of publication.
6. The Journal does not charge any expenses to download the published research papers for their own academic utilize.
|
| |
| | |